Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Adults With Stroke.

IMPORTANCE: Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Occupational therapy practitioners ensure maximum participation and performance in valued occupations for stroke survivors and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: These Practice Guidelines are meant to support occupational therapy practitioners' clinical decision making when working with people after stroke and their caregivers. METHOD: Clinical recommendations were reviewed from three systematic review questions on interventions to improve performance and participation in daily activities and occupations and from one question on maintaining the caregiving role for caregivers of people after stroke. RESULTS: The systematic reviews included 168 studies, 24 Level 1a, 90 Level 1b, and 54 Level 2b. These studies were used as the basis for the clinical recommendations in these Practice Guidelines and have strong or moderate supporting evidence. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Interventions with strong strength of evidence for improving performance in activities of daily living and functional mobility include mirror therapy, task-oriented training, mental imagery, balance training, self-management strategies, and a multidisciplinary three-stages-of-care rehabilitation program. Constraint-induced therapy has strong strength of evidence for improving performance of instrumental activities of daily living. Moderate strength of evidence supported cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to address balance self-efficacy, long-term group intervention to improve mobility in the community, and a wearable upper extremity sensory device paired with training games in inpatient rehabilitation to improve social participation. Practitioners should incorporate problem-solving therapy in combination with CBT or with education and a family support organizer program. What This Article Adds: These Practice Guidelines provide a summary of strong and moderate evidence for effective interventions for people with stroke and for their caregivers.

What occupational and physical therapists know about farmers' health.

Farmers are at high risk for losing their occupation because of their susceptibility for developing chronic conditions and incurring injuries. Although, occupational and physical therapists have basic education in return-to-work methods, specialty training is needed to help farmers with disabilities. The North Carolina AgrAbility Partnership, part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's supported AgrAbility Program, implemented an exploratory survey of North Carolina occupational and physical therapists before developing training curricula for working with farmers. State occupational and physical therapy association members were surveyed on what types of conditions they could treat, how comfortable they were in treating these conditions and making recommendations for environmental modifications, and what resources are available for farmers related to work site accommodations. Findings showed that less than one third of therapists had farm exposure or had ever treated farmers. Significant differences in identifying farmers' typical conditions were found between therapists who had treated and those who had not treated farmers. Physical therapists were more comfortable than occupational therapists in treating farmers for repetitive stress syndromes, work-related trauma, and musculoskeletal disorders while occupational therapists were more comfortable in treating farmers for social isolation and low vision. More physical therapists also rated themselves as competent in farm environmental assessment and adaptation. On the other hand, occupational therapists were aware of more agencies that aid farmers. Finally, few therapists had education on working with farmers or had heard of AgrAbility. To create farmer-centered intervention, therapists should take continuing education courses and investigate resources for helping farmers with chronic conditions and disabilities return to their chosen occupation.

Effectiveness of interventions for adults with psychological or emotional impairment after stroke: an evidence-based review.

This evidence-based review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions to prevent or mitigate the effects of psychological or emotional impairments after stroke. Thirty-nine journal articles met the inclusion criteria. Six types of interventions were identified that addressed depression, anxiety, or mental health-related quality of life: exercise or movement based, behavioral therapy and stroke education, behavioral therapy only, stroke education only, care support and coordination, and community-based interventions that included occupational therapy. Evidence from well-conducted research supports using problem-solving or motivational interviewing behavioral techniques to address depression. The evidence is inconclusive for using multicomponent exercise programs to combat depression after stroke and for the use of stroke education and care support and coordination interventions to address poststroke anxiety. One study provided support for an intensive multidisciplinary home program in improving depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life. The implications of the findings for practice, research, and education are discussed.

Patient Active Time During Therapy Sessions in Postacute Rehabilitation: Development and Validation of a New Measure.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The accurate measurement of therapy intensity in postacute rehabilitation is important for research to improve outcomes in this setting. We developed and validated a measure of Patient Active Time during physical (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) sessions, as a proxy for therapy intensity. METHODS: This measurement validity study was carried out with 26 older adults admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute rehabilitation with a variety of main underlying diagnoses, including hip fracture, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and others. They were participants in a randomized controlled trial that compared an experimental high-intensity therapy to standard-of-care therapy. Patient Active Time was observed by research raters as the total number of minutes that a patient was actively engaging in therapeutic activities during PT and OT sessions. This was compared to patient movement (actigraphy) quantified during some of the same PT/OT sessions using data from three-dimensional accelerometers worn on the patient's extremities. RESULTS: Activity measures were collected for 136 therapy sessions. Patient Active Time had high interrater reliability in both PT (r = 0.995, p < 0.001) and OT (r = 0.95, p = 0.012). Active time was significantly correlated with actigraphy in both PT (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) and OT (r = 0.60, p < 0.001) and discriminated between a high-intensity experimental condition and standard of care rehabilitation: in PT, 47.0 ± 13.5 min versus 16.7 ± 10.1 min (p < 0.001) and in OT, 46.2 ± 15.2 versus 27.7 ± 6.6 min (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic observation of Patient Active Time provides an objective, reliable, and valid index of physical activity during PT and OT treatment sessions that has utility as a real-world alternative to the measurement of treatment intensity. This measure could be used to differentiate higher from lower therapy treatment intensity and to help determine the optimal level of active therapy time for patients in postacute and other settings.

Enhanced medical rehabilitation increases therapy intensity and engagement and improves functional outcomes in postacute rehabilitation of older adults: a randomized-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: For millions of disabled older adults each year, postacute care in skilled nursing facilities is a brief window of opportunity to regain enough function to return home and live independently. Too often this goal is not achieved, possibly because of therapy that is inadequately intense or engaging. This study tested Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation, an intervention designed to increase patient engagement in, and intensity of, daily physical and occupational therapy sessions in postacute-care rehabilitation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation versus standard-of-care rehabilitation. SETTING: Postacute care unit of a skilled nursing facility in St Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six older adults admitted from a hospital for postacute rehabilitation. INTERVENTION: Based on models of motivation and behavior change, Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation is a set of behavioral skills for physical and occupational therapists that increase patient engagement and intensity, with the goal of improving functional outcome, through (1) a patient-directed, interactive approach, (2) increased rehabilitation intensity, and (3) frequent feedback to patients on their effort and progress. MEASUREMENTS: Therapy intensity: assessment of patient active time in therapy sessions. Therapy engagement: Rehabilitation Participation Scale. Functional and performance outcomes: Barthel Index, gait speed, and 6-minute walk. RESULTS: Participants randomized to Enhanced Medical Rehabilitation had higher intensity therapy and were more engaged in their rehabilitation sessions; they had more improvement in gait speed (improving from 0.08 to 0.38 m/s versus 0.08 to 0.22 in standard of care, P = .003) and 6-minute walk (from 73 to 266 feet versus 40 to 94 feet in standard of care, P = .026), with a trend for better improvement of Barthel Index (+43 points versus 26 points in standard of care, P = .087), compared with participants randomized to standard-of-care rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Higher intensity and patient engagement in the postacute rehabilitation setting is achievable, with resultant better functional outcomes for older adults. Findings should be confirmed in a larger randomized controlled trial.

Measuring treatment fidelity in a rehabilitation intervention study.

Attaining and demonstrating treatment fidelity is critical in the development and testing of evidence-based interventions. Treatment fidelity refers to the extent to which an intervention was implemented in clinical testing as it was conceptualized and is clearly differentiable from control or standard-of-care interventions. In clinical research, treatment fidelity is typically attained through intensive training and supervision techniques and demonstrated by measuring therapist adherence and competence to the protocol using external raters. However, in occupational and physical therapy outcomes research, treatment fidelity methods have not been used, which, in our view, is a serious gap that impedes novel treatment development and testing in these rehabilitation fields. In this article, we describe the development of methods to train and supervise therapists to attain adequate treatment fidelity in a treatment development project involving a novel occupational and physical therapy-based intervention. We also present a data-driven model for demonstrating therapist adherence and competence in the new treatment and its differentiation from standard of care. In doing so, we provide an approach that rehabilitation researchers can use to address treatment fidelity in occupational and physical therapy-based interventions. We recommend that all treatment researchers in rehabilitation disciplines use these or similar methods as a vital step in the development and testing of evidence-based rehabilitation interventions.